Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Activity default wait period policy and behavior of ORO_WAIT_REL in rtt 2.9 #2

Conversation

hamalMarino
Copy link

This PR is on top of toolchain-2.9.

@meyerj meyerj force-pushed the fix/activity_sleep_oro_wait_policies_toolchain-2.9 branch from b4946c0 to 6047c60 Compare January 8, 2018 20:54
@meyerj meyerj changed the base branch from toolchain-2.9 to master-update-hook-vs-callback-queue January 8, 2018 20:59
@meyerj
Copy link

meyerj commented Jan 8, 2018

Rebased on top of current head of orocos-toolchain#91, which will be merged into toolchain-2.9 afterwards.

@meyerj meyerj force-pushed the fix/activity_sleep_oro_wait_policies_toolchain-2.9 branch from cea891b to 00caecb Compare January 9, 2018 00:46
@meyerj meyerj merged commit 09f5543 into master-update-hook-vs-callback-queue Jan 16, 2018
@meyerj meyerj deleted the fix/activity_sleep_oro_wait_policies_toolchain-2.9 branch January 16, 2018 09:33
meyerj added a commit to orocos-toolchain/rtt that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2018
…ack-queue into toolchain-2.9

- Merge pull request Intermodalics#2 from fix/activity_sleep_oro_wait_policies_toolchain-2.9:
  Fix Activity default wait period policy and behavior of ORO_WAIT_REL
meyerj added a commit to orocos-toolchain/rtt that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2019
This was introduced in 06146b6 due to
a wrong understanding of `ORO_WAIT_ABS` and `ORO_WAIT_REL`. The old behavior was restored later in
171a700 and 6047c60
(Intermodalics#2), but without updating the class documentation.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Meyer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants